This flap over Barack Obama’s comment about lipstick on a pig is preposterous.
Here’s what he said—about John McCain’s promise to change Washington, D.C, no less: “You can put lipstick on a pig. It’s still a pig.”
And he continued: “You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still going to stink. We’ve had enough of the same old thing.”
Sarah Palin wasn’t belittled. No one was smeared, as McCain’s ad claims. Not even lipstick.

McCain’s campaign is howling with what Obama called phony outrage.
And the chatter of day has distracted voters from real issues—especially today, the war in Iraq.
This morning the president announced the withdrawal of 8,000 troops by February and a small troop increase for Afghanistan.
“His plan comes up short,” Obama said today of the new troops going to Afghanistan. “It is not enough troops, and not enough resources, with not enough urgency.”
And this from McCain:
“Senator Obama’s comments today demonstrate again his commitment to retreating from Iraq no matter what the cost. His focus in on withdrawal, not on victory.”
But what does victory look like?
McCain argues that the surge has brought about more than just a drop in violence.
“Political reconciliation is occurring across Iraq at the local and provincial grassroots level,” his “Web”:http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/FDEB03A7-30B0-4ECE-8E34-4C7EA83F11D8.htm site says. “Sunni and Shi’a chased from their homes by terrorist and sectarian violence are returning. The “Sons of Iraq” and Awakening movements, where former Sunni insurgents have now joined in the fight against Al Qaeda, continue to grow.”
Brian Katulis, a senior fellow for national security at the Center for American Progress, a progressive think tank in Washington D.C., offers a much more dire view in “The Guardian”:http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/10/iraq.usforeignpolicy newspaper today:
“The surge has frozen into place the accelerated fragmentation that Iraq underwent in 2006 and 2007 and has created disincentives to bridge central divisions between Iraqi factions,”he writes. “Moreover, rather than advancing Iraq’s political transition and facilitating power-sharing deals among Iraq’s factions, the surge has produced an oil revenue-fuelled, Shia-dominated national government with close ties to Iran. This national government shows few signs of seeking to compromise and share meaningful power with other frustrated political factions.”
This is what we should be talking about. Not pigs and lipstick.
PHOTO:
Pitbull in lipstick from “CafePress.com.”:http://www.cafepress.com