Misjustice at Justice?
-
- June
- 24
Is it too much to ask that the Justice Department follow the law?
From the Associated Press:
WASHINGTON (June 24) – Ivy Leaguers and other top law students were rejected for plum Justice Department jobs two years ago because of their liberal leanings or objections to Bush administration politics, a government report concluded today.
In one case, a Harvard Law student was passed over after criticizing the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. In another, a Georgetown University student who had previously worked for a Democratic senator and congressman didn’t make the cut.
Even senior Justice Department officials flinched at what appeared to be hiring decisions based — improperly and illegally — on politics, according to the internal report.
“Individuals at the department were rejecting any of our candidates who could be construed as left-wing or who were perceived, based on their appearances and resumes and so forth, as being more liberal,” Kevin Ohlson, deputy director of the department’s executive office of immigration review, complained to Justice investigators.
The report marked the culmination of a yearlong investigation by Justice’s inspector general and Office of Professional Responsibility into whether Republican politics were driving hiring polices at the once fiercely independent department.
The investigation is one of several that examine accusations of White House political meddling within the Justice Department. Those accusations were initially driven by the firings of nine U.S. attorneys in late 2006 and culminated with the ouster of Alberto Gonzales as attorney general last September.
PHOTO: By Eileen Blass, USA TODAY












Bush ahs not been a good president. But, for what is he being criticized here? The persons that Democrats like Pelosi hire to write their speeches and staff their offices are Democrats. Is this a coincidence? These are government jobs….Are they free to discriminate on the basis of an applicants politics? If they are, why not the president?
Surely all the decent law candidates screened out en route to careers by means of near-mandatory left wing bias in the educational system have felt the same sting.
News, it ain’t. There’s nothing to expose.
Philosophical nepotism is the lifeblood of “progressivism”.