Bosnian girl comes forward
-
- March
- 31
Last week I wondered when Emina Bicakcic would surface. She was the young Bosnian girl who greeted Hillary Clinton at the airport in Tuzla where Clinton later claimed to have dodged snipers.
Well today Bicakcic did — on the front of the New York Post
Bicakcic, now 20, tries in the words of the Post “to be diplomatic about Clinton’s embarrassing 1996 gaffe.”
“I was surprised when I heard this,” she told the Post.
Clinton has since said she misspoke.
This entry was posted
on Monday, March 31st, 2008 at 5:23 pm by Noreen O'Donnell.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Share and Enjoy:
|
Print This Post
|
Email This Post
Leave a Reply
It is a condition of your use of the comment features associated with the blogs that you do not: Use the site to post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane or indecent information of any kind, including without limitation any transmissions constituting or encouraging conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any local, state, national or international law. You alone are responsible for the material you post or send. Refer to the
Terms of Service.
Thats just the way she does everything! “double talking all the time”
“Clinton has since said she misspoke.”
You can keep repeating Clinton’s spin, but nobody’s buying it except you and your fellow Kool-Aid drinkers.
If you can stand the truth, Noreen, read what Christoper Hitchens has to say about Hillary’s haven “misspoken”:
The punishment visited on Sen. Hillary Clinton for her flagrant, hysterical, repetitive, pathological lying about her visit to Bosnia should be much heavier than it has yet been and should be exacted for much more than just the lying itself. There are two kinds of deliberate and premeditated deceit, commonly known as suggestio falsi and suppressio veri. (Neither of them is covered by the additionally lying claim of having “misspoken.”) The first involves what seems to be most obvious in the present case: the putting forward of a bogus or misleading account of events. But the second, and often the more serious, means that the liar in question has also attempted to bury or to obscure something that actually is true. Let us examine how Sen. Clinton has managed to commit both of these offenses to veracity and decency and how in doing so she has rivaled, if not indeed surpassed, the disbarred and perjured hack who is her husband and tutor.
Read the rest:
www.slate.com/toolbar.aspx?action=print&id=2187780
To Sara R, I salute you!!! It’s time that “we” bring down these clowns that call themselves “for the people” and send them back to the “OAKIES”. Oh I forgot, they don’t want them either!! some little thing called “White water”. He’s the ring leader and she’s the puppet! and they want us to laugh??? He lied to our faces and got away with it!!!! and she’s trying to do the same thing!! this must come to an end! The end of the Clintons!