lohud.com

Sponsored by:

… and another thing

A repository of random thoughts, odds and ends, and not-quite-fully-formed ideas.

Faux fur? Or not

December
19

You would think that fur owners would worry their fur wasn’t real—not the other way around.

But that’s exactly what the Humane Society of the United States says happened at Macy’s in Herald Square: A coat advertised as faux fur actually contains real fur.

The Sean John Hooded Snorkel Jacket was described online as containing nylon and faux fur and goose down. The coat supposedly had an imitation rabbit fur collar.

The Humane Society bought the coat. Its label says “Made in China” and “genuine raccoon fur,” according to the Humane Society.

The Macy’s Web site now says “We’re sorry. This product is currently unavailable.” And the picture’s been removed.

The Humane Society has submitted the coat for DNA testing to find out if it’s actually raccoon dog, a type of dog raised in China whose fur resembles raccoon. The Humane Society says dogs and cats are killed inhumanely in China.

UPDATE: A response from Federated Department Stores, Macy’s parent company:
“Our company has a standing policy against the selling of any dog or cat fur. This policy is clearly communicated to all suppliers. Our supplier contracts require that all products be labeled accurately. Any violation of our policies or contracts is pursued vigorously with our suppliers, and any inappropriate or inaccurately labeled product is removed from our stores and online sites. The information brought to our attention today by the Humane Society of the United States will be promptly investigated and appropriate action will be taken.”

A spokesman, Jim Sluzewski, said the jackets were immediately pulled from the stores and the Web site because they had been promoted as faux fur. But, he added, the Humane Society had no proof the fur was actually dog.

And this from Sean John: “The fabric content in all our garments is always properly labeled. However in this case, it appears that the trim of a jacket was incorrectly described by our retail partners and this error may have misled some consumers. For that we are very sorry.”

This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 19th, 2006 at 2:00 pm by Noreen O'Donnell.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Advertisement

One Response to “Faux fur? Or not”

  1. Tom T

    Slow news day, huh?

Leave a Reply

Advertisement
About the author
Noreen O'DonnellNoreen O'Donnell For the last 20 years, Noreen O'Donnell has written about Hillary Clinton's run for the Senate, rebuilding Ground Zero, the Korean immigrants who travel north each day from Queens to work in nail salons, deadly runaway fire trucks and other stories in Westchester and Putnam counties. Now she's a columnist.



Other recent entries




Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives




Bad Behavior has blocked 343 access attempts in the last 7 days.